Webb18 juni 2013 · Example: 1981 Supreme Court case, Michael M. v. Sonoma County, upheld California’s statutory rape law (had been challenged on equal protection grounds) Drucilla Cornell: statute embodies and reinforces assumptions about gender that cause harm The Court refuses to examine the role that the law plays in reinforcing the very … WebbMichael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County 1981 Petitioner: Michael M. Respondent: Superior Court of Sonoma County Petitioner's Claim: That the California …
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County - Washington …
WebbMichael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County 450 U.S. 464 Case Year: 1981 Case Ruling: 5-4, Affirmed Opinion Justice: Blackmun More Information FACTS Around … Webb9 apr. 2024 · Rather, these inherent differences are a valid justification for sex-based classifications when they realistically reflect the fact that the sexes are not similarly situated in certain circumstances, as recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in Michael M. v. Sonoma County, Superior Court (1981) and the Supreme Court of … number word anchor chart
M. v. Superior Court Case Brief for Law School LexisNexis
WebbThe Petitioner, Michael M. (Petitioner), was charged with statutory rape in California and now alleges that the State’s statute discriminates unconstitutionally against men only. … Webb1 See Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Asso. , 695 F.2d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1982); citing Petrie , 75 Ill.App.3d at 989, 394 N.E.2d at 862 (Redressing past discrimination against women in athletics is a legitimate and WebbMichael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County Quick Reference 450 U.S. 464 (1981), argued 4 Nov. 1980, decided 23 Mar. 1981 by vote of 5 to 4; Rehnquist for plurality … number word problems